Posted: February 28th, 2023
2 page apa format
Mini-Case Study: Managing Change at Global Green Books Publishing
Global Green Books Publishing is producing customized eBooks for a local college. It has just
received a large order for a new eBook on Strategic Human Resource Management in a Global
Context from a senior professor in the business school. This distinguished faculty member is
dissatisfied with the current textbooks, and wants a customized eBook for use with her on-
campus courses, graduate seminars, and her executive education courses. This is the most
complex eBook that Global Green Books has undertaken. Because this project is so important
to the professor, and will be used in so many different settings with different schedules, the
professor made sure that she had her complete eBook request in early to allow sufficient time
for production. She had selected a broad set of the best papers and had written an introduction
and background, along with discussion questions for each section. This meant that this project
was going to have an extensive set of permissions to acquire before production could happen,
as well as a large amount of desktop publishing for the new materials written by the professor.
She was quite certain that she had given Global Green Books more than enough time to have
her eBook ready before the first class needed it.
This large eBook went through the check and verify order step with a bit of back and forth with
the professor to verify the information needed for the extensive number of permissions, so that
started the project off with a bit of a delay. Because there were so many permissions, the
Supervisor who planned this project, accelerated the work on obtaining permissions to make
sure that all the permissions were received before they needed to start assembling and collating
the eBook in production.
As the Publishers Liaison worked through the extensive list of permissions, the Customer
Service Representative for the business school at the college started receiving several inputs
from the college about this project. One set of inputs was a continuing series of requests from
the professor. As new papers were released, she wanted to make a number of additions to the
eBook. Also, as time went on and she had more time to review her eBook plans, she started
identifying some changes that she wanted to make to her planned eBook.
Another input came from the business manager at the college bookstore, as he was quite
concerned about the projected cost of this eBook. Because this eBook included so many
reprints of existing articles and chapters, the estimated cost of the book was quite high. The
college expected their eBooks to be delivered at a low cost, as its bookstore costs had to cover
the bookstore overhead (servers for sales and distribution of the eBooks and marketing costs)
and the bookstore’s markup, as well as the costs of the eBook from Global Green Books. The
Global Green Books costs had to incorporate all the permissions costs, as well as all of the
desktop publishing and production costs.
The Customer Service Representative communicated these issues to several people within
Global Green Books: the account manager for the college account, the supervisor managing
production for this eBook, the Publishers Liaison obtaining permissions for this book. The
account manager was concerned about upsetting this important customer, the supervisor didn’t
know how these various requests could all be accommodated or how it would impact his project,
and the Publishers Liaison was worried both about added costs for new permissions and the
time it would take to get them and the costs they had already expended for permissions no
longer needed.
And the professor’s requests just kept coming, at an increasing rate as it got closer to her
deadline for needing this eBook.
The supervisor was starting to make some estimates of what each change requested by the
professor would cost
An extra $500 for each new permission needed, in addition to the $500 already spent for
each permission already acquired that can no longer be used
Two hours of Publishers Liaison effort for each new permission needed at an
unburdened cost of $22 per hour (loaded cost is $55 with a 1.5 overhead rate)
One hour of supervisor time for replanning each change at an unburdened cost of $28
per hour (loaded cost is $70 with a 1.5 overhead rate)
Sales commission of 20%
This continuing series of requests for changes from the professor is quickly adding to the
upwardly spiraling cost of this project. The supervisor feels that something must be done
about this scope creep – continually changing scope.
CIS213 – Project Management
Mini Case Study – Managing Change
Copyright 2022 Post University, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Due: Midnight
Sunday of
Unit 7.
In this assignment, you will explore the business situation that the Global Green Books Publishing is facing and how it was resolved using effective project management.
The requirements for the assignments are:
· Read the Mini Case Study attached to the assignment.
· Answer the following questions based on the reading:
1. Who are the stakeholders of this project? Who are the key stakeholders of the project?
2. What impacts could these requested changes have on the budget?
3. Could these requested changes also impact the schedule? If so, how?
4. What is Global Green Book’s process for dealing with changes from their customers?
5. Do you see any possible issues with this process?
6. How would you recommend that Global Green Books handle these changes? Who should be involved?
7. What should Global Green Books do about the conflicting inputs from their customer – the bookstore manager who wants inexpensive eBooks and the professor who wants the best and most up-to-date collection of readings possible for her courses?
· The paper must be APA-formatted as a Word document.
· SafAssign will be used to check this assignment for plagiarism. Remember to paraphrase in your own words and do not copy directly.
· The length must be a minimum of two pages, excluding the title and reference pages.
· Include at least one reference.
Refer to the next page for the grading rubric.
Students: Be sure to read the criteria, by which your paper/project will be evaluated,
before you write, and again
after you write.
Grading Rubric
CRITERIA |
Deficient |
Proficient |
Exemplary |
||||
0 – 47 points |
48-53 points |
54-60 points |
|||||
Question Answers |
Majority of questions are not answered adequately. |
Most questions are clearly answered in sufficient detail. |
All questions are clearly answered in sufficient detail. |
||||
0-15 points |
16-17 points |
18-20 points |
|||||
Clear and professional writing and APA format |
Errors impede professional presentation; guidelines not followed. |
Few errors that do not impede professional presentation. |
Writing and format is clear, professional, APA compliant, and error free. |
||||
0 – 7 points |
8 points |
9-10 points |
|||||
Resources |
No resource or inappropriate resource. |
One Appropriate Resource. |
More than One Appropriate Resource. |
||||
Paper Length |
Less than 2 pages of appropriate content. |
2 pages of appropriate content. |
More than 2 pages of appropriate content. |
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.